This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun Oct 2 19:51:23 CEST 2011
Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:43:37PM +0200, Martin Millnert wrote: > I was actually looking for you the other day on IRC... I saw a couple > of /48's in DFZ coming not from PIv6, but allocated by LIR's (thus, > announced with different origin than the /32 they came from), the > other day. IIRC, your data captured these [ easier-than-PIv6 ] > allocations as well. Is that right? My scripts break down the numbers by raw size (so-many /48s, so-many /32s), which is where the numbers that Sander posted came from - so it's actually even less PIv6 than /48s out there, yes: http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/R62-v6-table/page24.html I have another script that breaks down the numbers by region and by category (PA/PI/IXP/...), but haven't run that one since May - the May numbers are here: http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/R62-v6-table/page26.html http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/R62-v6-table/page28.html the "more specifics from PA netblocks" show up in the "subnets" column of the "LIR" rows, and indeed, in May we had about 1800 PA deaggregates in the table, of about 5500 routes in total. I'll re-run these scripts some time next week, and post fully up-to-date numbers. > It would be interesting to see graphs of these and over time, if > possible, to try and detect and correlate changes with policy, > somehow. In slide 26 you can get an idea on the effects of PI on the global table over time. That slide shows the majority of "non-PA" routes to be from the ARIN region (which is in line with them having the first IPv6 PI policy at all, and a fairly liberal with that), and they had reached ~700 "non-PA" routes in May (with ~1400 "PA" routes). You can't really see policy changes there, except for the "from now on, you can have PI!" kickoff - but what you can see is the effect of the RIR IPv6 marketing campaigns, notably APNIC in early 2010. Gert Doering -- with the IPv6 numbers hat on -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111002/16d230f5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]