This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Sun Oct 2 11:39:50 CEST 2011
On 01/10/2011 19:36, Michel Py wrote: > It's all about money. The collective cost of announcing a prefix in the > DFZ is less than the collective cost of having a complex and impossible > to troubleshoot multihoming mechanism based on PA. As long as a DFZ slot > does not cost $100 or $1000 a month, organizations will not go for a > more complex mechanism. We are several orders of magnitude below the > cost threshold. Can we move past this notion of charging for DFZ slots? There is no practical way of doing it and constantly harping on about it is pointless and distracting. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]