This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 routing table stats
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Mon Oct 3 18:49:56 CEST 2011
Geert, thanks! On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >> It would be interesting to see graphs of these and over time, if >> possible, to try and detect and correlate changes with policy, >> somehow. > > In slide 26 you can get an idea on the effects of PI on the global > table over time. That slide shows the majority of "non-PA" routes to > be from the ARIN region (which is in line with them having the first > IPv6 PI policy at all, and a fairly liberal with that), and they had > reached ~700 "non-PA" routes in May (with ~1400 "PA" routes). > > You can't really see policy changes there, except for the "from now on, > you can have PI!" kickoff - but what you can see is the effect of the RIR > IPv6 marketing campaigns, notably APNIC in early 2010. I was unclear. I meant, from now on and into the future. :) (ie, keep doing the stats.) Looking forward for your re-run. Thanks again, Regards, Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 routing table stats
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]