This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Sun Oct 2 21:01:05 CEST 2011
> Erik Bais wrote: > Hi Michel and David, > I like a technical discussion about scaling routers > probably as much as you, however that is a bit outside > the scope of the suggested policy I think. It is, guilty as charged. I apologize. I support the policy. Anything that can facilitate IPv6 deployment today has to be done, regardless of long-term consequences and even if it means establishing precedents that nobody really likes. Michel.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]