[address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)

Agree +6



On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Bijal Sanghani <BSanghani at relianceglobalcom.com> wrote:

> Agree, +5
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bijal Sanghani
> Reliance Globalcom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of kpn-ip-office at kpn.com
> Sent: 18 June 2010 06:44
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
> 
> +4
> 
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> 
> ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema
> KPN IP-Office
> kpn-ip-office at kpn.com
> +31 70 45 13398
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] Namens Marco Hogewoning
> Verzonden: donderdag 17 juni 2010 21:09
> Aan: David Freedman
> CC: Remco van Mook; nick at inex.ie; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
> 
> +3
> 
> M
> 
> On 17 jun 2010, at 20:31, David Freedman wrote:
> 
>> +2 
>> 
>> Dave.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 17/06/2010 10:47, "Remco van Mook" <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Remco
>>> 
>>> On 17/06/2010 15:50, Emilio Madaio wrote:
>>>>    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-04.html
>>> 
>>> agree.  please implement.
>>> 
>>> Nick
> 
> MarcoH
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>