This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bijal Sanghani
BSanghani at relianceglobalcom.com
Fri Jun 18 09:29:07 CEST 2010
Agree, +5 Regards, Bijal Sanghani Reliance Globalcom -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of kpn-ip-office at kpn.com Sent: 18 June 2010 06:44 To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup) +4 With kind regards, ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema KPN IP-Office kpn-ip-office at kpn.com +31 70 45 13398 -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] Namens Marco Hogewoning Verzonden: donderdag 17 juni 2010 21:09 Aan: David Freedman CC: Remco van Mook; nick at inex.ie; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup) +3 M On 17 jun 2010, at 20:31, David Freedman wrote: > +2 > > Dave. > > > > On 17/06/2010 10:47, "Remco van Mook" <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Remco >> >> On 17/06/2010 15:50, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-04.html >> >> agree. please implement. >> >> Nick MarcoH The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]