[address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule Ambiguity Cleanup)

Agree, +6

Regards   ///   Eva
Registry TeliaNet

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bijal Sanghani" <BSanghani at relianceglobalcom.com>
To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule 
Ambiguity Cleanup)


Agree, +5

Regards,

Bijal Sanghani
Reliance Globalcom

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net 
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of kpn-ip-office at kpn.com
Sent: 18 June 2010 06:44
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule 
Ambiguity Cleanup)

+4


With kind regards,


ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema
KPN IP-Office
kpn-ip-office at kpn.com
+31 70 45 13398

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net 
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] Namens Marco Hogewoning
Verzonden: donderdag 17 juni 2010 21:09
Aan: David Freedman
CC: Remco van Mook; nick at inex.ie; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-04 New Policy Proposal (80% Rule 
Ambiguity Cleanup)

+3

M

On 17 jun 2010, at 20:31, David Freedman wrote:

> +2
>
> Dave.
>
>
>
> On 17/06/2010 10:47, "Remco van Mook" <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Remco
>>
>> On 17/06/2010 15:50, Emilio Madaio wrote:
>> >     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-04.html
>>
>> agree.  please implement.
>>
>> Nick

MarcoH

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please 
note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any 
e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any 
virus transmitted by this email.