This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Fri Dec 5 09:34:08 CET 2008
Gert Doering said: > > Interesting that 52 attendees out of 6000 RIPE members are able to make > > such a change. > > Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is how the > articles of the NCC are set up. The majority of the LIRs (+proxy votes) > that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the charging > scheme (and possible changes to the articles). But what is the quorum for the meeting? Is it really as small as under 1%? If the meeting isn't quorate, its decisions are invalid. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS - a Cable and Wireless business
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]