This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
poty at iiat.ru
poty at iiat.ru
Thu Dec 4 14:16:16 CET 2008
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Garry Glendown Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:59 PM To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01 ... Speaking of customers - what about customers who aren't an LIR's customers anymore? Can those PI assignments be "redirected" towards either RIPE or the new provider? Or the Enduser himself? Might be hard to come up out of the blue and send a bill over x€ in such a case ... -garry -------------------------- That is the point! There is no way of controlling PIs which have been already issued. Some of them are already routed through other companies and have no relation to the issuer LIR. And there is no mechanism of "returning" these PI assignments and avoid the unfair burdens. Vladislav Potapov Ru.iiat
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]