This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Dec 4 20:09:01 CET 2008
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Gert Doering wrote: >> I did find this: >> http://www.ripe.net/news/gm-october-2008.html >> Interesting that 52 attendees out of 6000 RIPE members are able to make >> such a change. > > Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is how the > articles of the NCC are set up. The majority of the LIRs (+proxy votes) > that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the charging > scheme (and possible changes to the articles). > > I could now argue "the remaining LIRs could have sent proxy votes" and > then you can answer "we haven't been invited" - we're turning in a circle, > and this is not a good situation and needs to be sorted out. This troubles me. Imagine RBN setting up 40-50 extra-small LIRs all for under 200-300KEuro and then manipulating the RIPE voting to favor almost any agenda they may have. Having such a criticial infrastructure such as RIPE being "adjusted" by just 52 votes (less than 1% of its members) is sheer madness IMHO. I would have hoped that the RIPE NCC would address this issue and encourage members to come and vote - give a free 8GB DOK if that is what is needed. :-) > I'm sorry if I came across as "arrogant" here. That wasn't my intention > - I really thought that all LIRs would receive these invitations, and I > think the best way to sort this out might be to ask lir-help at ripe.net to > look into their records - and depending on the outcome, it might be a > good idea to make sure that AGM invitations are definitely distributed > to the listed admin-c and tech-c contacts for a LIR. Gert, I don't think you came across arrogant at all. But in addition to distributing the AGM invites to not just ncc-announce but to admin-c and tech-c as you suggest, I would suggest we somehow get a larger pool of LIRs involved to vote - otherwise we may wake up in the near future to some very strange new policies. -Hank > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]