This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Wed Apr 6 09:50:42 CEST 2005
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Oliver Bartels wrote: > And from the discussion it sounds like He told them to > pray that every household should become a RIPE NCC > member and thus IPv6 address space is in great danger. > > No math please, no facts, just *believe and pray* :-( > > Btw.: I estimate about <<1 Mio. households within the > RIPE NCC region. Even if there is a /32 for each > household, still <1/1000 part of the IPv6 address space > is given up. Please re-do your math. Germany also has, what 80 or 100 million people? Would it be safe to say that equates, to, at least 30 Mio households. Do the math globally and we're maybe at 2 billion households. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message (by thread): how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]