how 200 /48's fails the job [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:50:42 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
>Please re-do your math.  Germany also has, what 80 or 100 million 
>people?  Would it be safe to say that equates, to, at least 30 Mio 
>households.
This is correct, I estimated the number of companies and it
was early in the morning.

>Do the math globally and we're maybe at 2 billion households.
We are talking about RIPE.

Nevertheless:

It is useless, stay with your China comes to Europe theory,
keep your 200 customers pseudo rule, we will clearly not
invest a single cent into IPv6 and I won't bet a penny
that this protocol under the current concrete head policy
conditions will ever gain a anyhow usable distribution
in our world.

Propably it takes another ten years, then propably there
has some significantly better protocol (think e.g. of embedded
search queries processed by routers) been defined and the
whole IPv6 effort is for this animal, which receives so much
care by managers and developers with useless designs:
The cat.

For me this is now end of discussion,

Congratulations to the concrete heads for putting IPv6
successfully to grave.

Best regards
Oliver



Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany
oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0