This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Tue Apr 5 16:11:30 CEST 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:58:10 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote: >I for one don't want to see the routers CPUs' screaming red when a >random brazilian ISP experiences a fiber cut and I see 5,000 v6 >prefixes churning in most routers in the world because of that. You won't see it screaming red. Because the job is done in about <50ms and this is standard business *today*. A 5000 prefix update is what happens quite often e.g. if an exchange router is restarted. What happens: *Nothing*. *No impact at all*. Question: Do you intend to implement IPv6 and BGP on a 8080 CPU ? >PI to end-users => lots of processing on routers when those sites, >their ISPs, transits, ..., experience failures. Pi works today. Pleas stop FUDing. Best regards Oliver Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]