This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Tue Apr 5 15:58:10 CEST 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote: >> And that's exactly the problem. This forum is more or less a marketing >> forum, and as such it's the wrong place to decide on these issues, as >> these are ENGINEERING tradeoffs. > > Name the engineering problems of end-user PI. (Un)fortunately nobody > was yet able to show convincing prove that there IS a problem. Stop > FUDding. I for one don't want to see the routers CPUs' screaming red when a random brazilian ISP experiences a fiber cut and I see 5,000 v6 prefixes churning in most routers in the world because of that. PI to end-users => lots of processing on routers when those sites, their ISPs, transits, ..., experience failures. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]