This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Apr 5 19:03:25 CEST 2005
> I for one don't want to see the routers CPUs' screaming red when a > random brazilian ISP experiences a fiber cut and I see 5,000 v6 > prefixes churning in most routers in the world because of that. > > PI to end-users => lots of processing on routers when those sites, > their ISPs, transits, ..., experience failures. but that's what the users WANTED. and we have to give them what they want, even if it poisons them and the rest of the world because they don't understand the long term scaling implications. if we don't, ipv6 won't sell, and this is the ipv6 marketing dept, ya? randy
- Previous message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]