This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Oct 29 08:21:08 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I should know better than replying to this... On 2004-10-29, at 09.59, Jeff Williams wrote: > Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: >> On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different >>> policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such? >> >> No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed >> this and agreed on it. >> >>> Interesting >>> method of policy determination.. >> >> Why? This is how all address-policy is determined. > > And there is the curx of the problem... Ah...you mean an open and transparent policy process? Ok fare enough. Most the rest of us think that is a good thing. You're ofcourse free to disagree. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQYHhXKarNKXTPFCVEQKM4wCgwXPOXk125iEJ5C4zPoWT4lAsPGkAoPDd ovgvWo1X09V8ro0kJXIpOdVX =WQiB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]