[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated

Kurt and all,

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> >
> >   Thanks for your explanation.  So I guess this means two different
> > policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such?
>
> No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed
> this and agreed on it.
>
> > Interesting
> > method of policy determination..
>
> Why? This is how all address-policy is determined.

  And there is the curx of the problem...

>
>
> - - kurtis -
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.1
>
> iQA/AwUBQYHX9KarNKXTPFCVEQI/TwCgnxQ84L4OzisqnaMmfKmGjQ2GrvsAoJiG
> 1XV3UNYgYg7okusqfoa8vIdd
> =fY3J
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827