[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated

Kurt and all,

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I should know better than replying to this...

  Well I am sorry you feel that way...

>
>
> On 2004-10-29, at 09.59, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> >> On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>   Thanks for your explanation.  So I guess this means two different
> >>> policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such?
> >>
> >> No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed
> >> this and agreed on it.
> >>
> >>> Interesting
> >>> method of policy determination..
> >>
> >> Why? This is how all address-policy is determined.
> >
> >   And there is the curx of the problem...
>
> Ah...you mean an open and transparent policy process?

  No of course not...

> Ok fare enough.
> Most the rest of us think that is a good thing. You're ofcourse free to
> disagree.

  No I am all for it.  However if a policy for one is different than
for another is that wise?  Maybe so, maybe not so...  If Afnic is
happy with it, great!  >;)  But is it reasonable to call it a "Policy".
Or would it be more accurate to say a "Policy for Afnic" and
everyone else has a different policy?

Just trying to understand what the criterion if any for
determining "Policies" are and should be...

  But I am happy to see that not one size fits all, if you will
pardon the pun...  >;)

>
>
> - - kurtis -
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.1
>
> iQA/AwUBQYHhXKarNKXTPFCVEQKM4wCgwXPOXk125iEJ5C4zPoWT4lAsPGkAoPDd
> ovgvWo1X09V8ro0kJXIpOdVX
> =WQiB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827