This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Oct 29 07:41:02 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote: > > Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different > policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such? No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed this and agreed on it. > Interesting > method of policy determination.. Why? This is how all address-policy is determined. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQYHX9KarNKXTPFCVEQI/TwCgnxQ84L4OzisqnaMmfKmGjQ2GrvsAoJiG 1XV3UNYgYg7okusqfoa8vIdd =fY3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]