[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:16AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> And in any case, the people really interested, will do it anyway. More
> concretely, the people (not just a few) that actually attend the several
> RIRs meetings, will save some resources.  

I certainly don't have budget (neither time nor financial) to travel 
to non-european places for "policy meetings".  I would *love* to go to
nice places in the US, or the far east, but somebody has to pay for it...

OTOH, I like the existing system - it does the job pretty well.  There 
are some regional differences, which isn't very surprising, as the member
structure of the different regions is also very much different.  But
even if applied to a global resource some (minor) local differences
make sense - if the underlying people and enterprises are different, the
rules must adapt (most obvious example: the NIR structure in the AP
region).

Also, looking at the difficulties *today* of making a sensible policy,
I can't see it getting any easier if even more people of wildly varying
cultural background need to agree on something.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299