This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue Jul 6 09:56:30 CEST 2004
Hi Gert, I understand your point, but actually traveling to US or even AP sometimes is even cheaper than traveling to Europe, at least from Madrid ;-) Regards, Jordi ---- Original Message ---- From: "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> Cc: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)" > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:32:16AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> And in any case, the people really interested, will do it anyway. More >> concretely, the people (not just a few) that actually attend the several >> RIRs meetings, will save some resources. > > I certainly don't have budget (neither time nor financial) to travel > to non-european places for "policy meetings". I would *love* to go to > nice places in the US, or the far east, but somebody has to pay for it... > > OTOH, I like the existing system - it does the job pretty well. There > are some regional differences, which isn't very surprising, as the member > structure of the different regions is also very much different. But > even if applied to a global resource some (minor) local differences > make sense - if the underlying people and enterprises are different, the > rules must adapt (most obvious example: the NIR structure in the AP > region). > > Also, looking at the difficulties *today* of making a sensible policy, > I can't see it getting any easier if even more people of wildly varying > cultural background need to agree on something. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster ********************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]