[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size

> So please: constructive criticism is welcome, but things like
> "all that you do is wrong, because APNIC is doing something!"
> (and no further reason or detail given) are just wasting our
> time.

excuse!  where did i say that?  please do not put stupid words into
my keyboard, i do that well enough.  i merely responded to what i
considered an unwise statement which sets an incorrect atmosphere
and could become a quoted precident set by a co-chair of this wg.

>>> So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to
>>> RIPE lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's
>>> wrong with assuming consensus, then?

i still consider this unwise, and for the reasons i stated.  and,
in the face of such statements, i do not consider pointing out that
we are making, or proposing to make, policy that affects the global
internet a waste of time.  if you feel it wastes yours, you have a
delete key.

randy