[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size

hi,

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:46:56AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > So please: constructive criticism is welcome, but things like
> > "all that you do is wrong, because APNIC is doing something!"
> > (and no further reason or detail given) are just wasting our
> > time.
> 
> excuse!  where did i say that?  

*You* didn't.

Jeff Williams did, to which I replied, and then you came in and implied 
that we don't care about globality...

> please do not put stupid words into
> my keyboard, i do that well enough.  i merely responded to what i
> considered an unwise statement which sets an incorrect atmosphere
> and could become a quoted precident set by a co-chair of this wg.

Sorry for that.  You are right, it wasn't meant to be read that
way in absoluteness ("what do we care about other regions").  

Of course we care, but for the RIPE policy process, the accusation
(from Jeff) "You are mistaken Hans.  It would benefit you and everyone 
here if you would track Apnic a little closer...", in response to the
statement from Hans-Petter "we don't have any objections, so we can
assume consensus here", is ridiculous.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299