This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 14 17:40:47 CET 2004
Hi, On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:25:58AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE > > lists, and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's wrong > > with assuming consensus, then? > > maybe because we have not yet implemented that packets and routing > information stay only within the ripe region? it's the global > internet we're affecting. As the global routing information *does* affect ourselves as well, you can be assured that we won't (all) loose that aspect out of focus. The policy change in question had *exactly* this in mind: avoid people going for 2 or more PI prefixes just because they were not allowed to get *one* PA allocation. So please: constructive criticism is welcome, but things like "all that you do is wrong, because APNIC is doing something!" (and no further reason or detail given) are just wasting our time. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]