1. Introduction

The purpose of this document is to describe the role, responsibility responsibilities, and expectations associated with RIPE Working Group (WG) Chairs.

The document is divided into the following sections:

• WG chairs Chairs and co-chairs
• Creating WG charters
• Updating WG charters
• Policy Development Process (PDP) responsibilities
• RIPE Meeting responsibilities

2. Working Group Chairs and Co-Chairs

WG chairs and co-chairs should always make it clear whether they speak on behalf of themselves, the organisations they work for or the WG for which they are chair or co-chair.

RIPE WGs have two different ways of dividing up the responsibilities of the WG chair(s): WG Chair Model and Equal Co-Chair Model. The model that is used depends upon the specific needs, history and set-up of a particular WG.

i) WG Chair Model

In this model, a WG chair has overall responsibility for the WG and can be supported by co-chairs. These co-chairs can assist with general WG support and can deputise for the WG chair if he/she is not able to attend a RIPE Meeting.

ii) Equal Co-Chair Model

In this model, RIPE Working Groups operate under a co-chair model. In this, the co-chairs share the responsibility for RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP) and RIPE Meeting activities. all tasks involved in chairing their working group. The co-chairs act together to make any formal statements (for example on policy development) that are relevant to their WG. For each RIPE Meeting, one of the co-chairs serves as the primary contact for the WG and for session organisational matters.

The number of chairs and co-chairs of each WG should not exceed three (3).

A WG has either 2 or 3 co-chairs.

When participating in RIPE discussions, WG Chairs and co-chairs should endeavour to make it clear whether they speak on behalf of themselves, the organisations they work for, or the WG for which they are co-chair.

3. Creating Working Group Charters

i) Working Group created Created from a Task Force

A WG usually emerges from a Task Force. In this case, the procedure for creating the WG Charter charter is as follows:

The head of the Task Force creates the charter for the new WG in consultation with other members of the Task Force. Once this has been agreed, and approved by the RIPE Chair, the charter for the new WG is officially recognised.

ii) New Working Group Emerging from an Existing WG

If a new WG emerges from an existing WG, then the chairs and co-chairs of both the new and existing WG should draw up the charter for the new WG. Once this has been agreed, and approved by the RIPE Chair, the charter for the new WG is officially recognised.

4. Updating Working Group Charters

If a WG Chair needs to update the WG charter, he/she needs to they must have the text approved by the WG co-chairs before presenting the revised charter to the WG for their approval via the WG mailing list and/or at a RIPE Meeting. list. The RIPE Chair has final approval of the new charter.

5. Policy Development Process (PDP) Responsibilities

WG Chairs are expected to:

• Stay up-to-date with all phases of a policy proposal relevant to their WG
• Follow discussions on the relevant WG mailing list(s)
• Guide mailing list discussions as appropriate
• Take charge of PDP milestone decisions relevant to their WG
• Ensure PDP milestone decisions keep to the timeframe as described in the document “Policy "Policy Development Process in
• RIPE” (ripe-500)Make a collective, final decision supported by a reasonable level of awareness as to whether a particular
RIPE Link: http://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/pdp "Inform the RIPE NCC when a policy proposal has received consensus
• Inform the RIPE NCC when a policy proposal has received consensus and should become a RIPE Document

Note – In a WG with an equal co-chair model [see 2(i)], that these responsibilities are shared between the co-chairs.

6. RIPE Meetings Meeting Responsibilities

i) General/Plenary

WG Chairs are expected to:

• Attend RIPE Meetings or ensure that a co-chair attends the meeting
• Lead a Plenary session as agreed in advance of the meeting and pass on any action points that are decided in this Plenary session to the relevant WG

Note – In a WG with an equal co-chair model [see 2(i)], these responsibilities are shared between the co-chairs.

ii) Working Group Specific

WG chairs Chairs are expected to:

• Solicit relevant presentations content for the WG session
• Post a draft agenda for their WG session (at least 2-3 weeks before a RIPE Meeting where possible)
• Lead the WG session and encourage active participation
• Review and approve the minutes from their WG session (4-6 weeks)
• Attend WG chair Chair lunches during RIPE Meetings
• Attend WG chair Chair meetings between RIPE Meetings if needed
• Update the action list of their WG after the RIPE Meeting
• Approach the RIPE Chair and the EOF Coordinator with any requests to fund a speaker's attendance at a RIPE Meeting. If the request for funding is deemed appropriate by the RIPE Chair and the EOF Coordinator, Chair, the RIPE Chair will request funding from the RIPE NCC Managing Director. The RIPE NCC Managing Director may or may not approve such a request at his own discretion.

  Note – In a WG with an equal co-chair model [see 2(i)], one co-chair takes overall responsibility for these activities at a particular RIPE Meeting.

  their own discretion.
• Develop, maintain, and implement a procedure for the selection and removal of WG Chairs for the WG.

These responsibilities may be split between co-chairs.

Changes Since ripe-542

Minor:

• Changed to Oxford comma, because we love clarity.
• Converted to gender-neutral pronouns (they).
• Updated reference to RIPE PDP.
• Chairs get "content" not "presentations" for WG sessions.
• Added "if needed" to attending WG Chairs meetings between RIPE Meetings.

Major:

• Eliminated the chair with optional co-chair model.
• Added RIPE Chair as final approval of new charters.
• Changed new charter approval only to mailing list (was "and/or at a RIPE Meeting").
• Noted that we no longer have the WG Chair responsibility to act as final approval on all new policies (outside of their own WG).
• Removed responsibility to lead Plenary sessions, since the PC now does that.
• Removed references to the EOF Coordinator since that role does not really exist now.
• Added responsibility for WG Chairs for WG selection procedure.

Approval of Document

This document was approved by the RIPE Chair.