- Legend
- Added
- Deleted
Task Forces
RIPE tasks are structured in two ways: time frame and task group.
The task groups will be assigned to task forces, which are groups of individuals having a vital interest to achieve the tasks. The task forces will designate a coordinator whose responsibility it is to make sure progress is made and results will be achieved within the time frame timeframe the task force has agreed on.
Each task will be assigned to a number of task force members. A date for completion and for a first report will be set and agreed by the task force and especially by those to work on the task. Reports are used to monitor a tasks progress and keep other RIPE members interested in it informed. Reports can be very informal. It is important that the task gets done, not the reports. Note that the name task force implies that tasks are clearly defined and should be achievable within a set time frame.
The time frames for RIPE tasks are:
- short term (a few weeks to two months)
- long term (a few months)
- ongoing (this is something that needs to be done continuously, in this case the task force's task is to define a way to do the ongoing activity, get it started and monitor it's progress)
The task groups are:
- Connectivity and Routing
- Network Management and Operations
- Domain Name System
- Formal Coordination
- Statistics and Performance
The outcome of a task force consists of a report with recommendations. The recommendations will be discussed in the RIPE framework, and when consensus concensus has been reached will be implemented.
Task Force 1: Connectivity and Routing
IP connectivity in Europe is not based on a strong backbone network such as NSFnet or EARN. It is not clear whether such a backbone will be feasible in the forseeable future. This makes IP connectivity problems much harder to solve technically, operationally and politically. This task force will be assigned all the tasks relating to the technical and design problems of achieving optimum connectivity.
Quite some input should be generated to task force 2 (Network Management and Operations) so that it can plan how to master the operational problems and can give feedback about problems that can be overcome by a different design.
Also input should be generated to task force 4 (Formal (Fromal Coordination) on the necessary formal agreements for the use of infrastructures owned by the RIPE member organisations. How to get these agreements is a task of TF 4.
Task 1-1: Maintain Make an inventory of international IP connectivity in Europe and from Europe to other continents.
Task 1-2: Maintain
Term: Dec89
Task 1-2: Make
Task 1-3: Coordinate
Term: Jan90
Task 1-3: Make a plan formembers and to other continents.
Term: Mar90, first report Jan90
Task 1-4: Design a routing scheme to be used on the international infrastructure coordinated by RIPE (EGP, BGP ....).
Term: Mar90, first report Jan90
Task 1-5: Monitor the setting up of RIPE coordinated routing and adapt the design if necessary.
Task Force co-ordinator:
person: Thomas Lenggenhager
address: SWITCH Geschaeftstelle
address: ETH-Zentrum
address: CH-8092 Zurich
address: SWITZERLAND
phone: +41 1 261 8178
fax-no: +41 1 261 8133
e-mail: lenggenhager@verw.switch.ch
Term: ongoing
Task Force 2: Network Management and Operations
European IP traffic is carried by a multitude of different infrastructures. The resulting pan-European IP infrastructure needs to be well managed in coordination with the managements of the underlying infrastructures. Currently this works well enough. With the expected growth a generally agreed management coordination is needed.
This task force should develop a managament framework and collect the necessary management information.
Coordination with all other task forces activities is needed.
Task 2-1: Maintain Create and maintain a (`whois') database about RIPE IP networks and their management information.
Task 2-2: Maintain
Term: Ongoing, reports monthly, first Dec89
Task 2-2: Create
Term: Jan90
Task 2-3: Create a procedure for notification of security relevant problems assuming that the networks itself are unusable. Term:
June 91Task 2-4: Maintain
Task 2-4: Develop
Task 2-5:
Term: Mid90, first rep Jan90
Task 2-5: Gather operating statistics. Traffic volume. Number of networks, hosts. etc. These are useful for planning and external publicity.
Term: Ongoing, first rep Jan90
Task 2-6:2-5 to all interested parties. Term: End90, first rep Mar90
Task 2-6: 2-7: Maintenance and distribution of sets of common utilities, needed for the execution of the tasks 2-1 to
2-4.Task 2-7:
Term: ongoing.
Task 2-8:
Task Force
co-ordinator:
person: Daniel Karrenberg
address: CWI
address: Science Park Watergraafsmeer (WCW)
address: Kruislaan 413
address: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam
address: The Netherlands
phone: +31 20 5924112
fax-no: +31 20 5924199
e-mail: dfk@cwi.nl
Europe needs a set of well coordinated name servers. nameservers. Europe also needs a set of name servers nameservers that is resistent to partial loss of connectivity, especially with the US.
Task 3-1: Maintain Create a database containing name space namespace administration data: who administers top level domains and first level subdomains. This is for management purposes.
Term: Jan90
Task 3-2: Coordinate backup name servers nameservers (secondaries) within RIPE and within the Internet.
Term: Jan90
Task 3-3: Design a framework of DNS backup servers within RIPE and get backup for root name service to Europe.
Term: Mar90
Task 3-4: Maintain a list of recommended DNS software and known bugs.
Term: ongoing, Jan90
Task 3-5: Study mailrouting and MX records.
Task Force co-ordinator:
person: Francis Dupont
address: Institut National de Recherche en
address: Informatique et Automatique
address: Domaine de Voluceau, B.P. 105
address: F-78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX
address: France
phone: +33 1 39 63 52 13
e-mail: Francis.Dupont@inria.fr
Term: ongoing, first report Mar90.
Task Force 4: Formal Coordination
To make IP in Europe work we need formal agreements between the different networks. We also need to represent the RIPE activity to the outside world. This should be done by a separate task force but in very close coordination with the other RIPE task forces.
Task 4-1: Propose a template agreement on IP cooperation.
Term: Jan90
Task 4-2: Maintain contacts with CCIRN and FNC directly.
Term: ongoing
Task 4-3: Start formal contacts with other organisations as necessary.
Task Force co-ordinator:
person: Rob Blokzijl
address: NIKHEF
address: Science Park Watergraafsmeer (WCW)
address: Kruislaan 409
address: NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam
address: The Netherlands
phone: +31 20 592 0413
fax-no: +31 20 592 5155
e-mail: k13@nikhef.nl
Task Force 5: Statistics and Performance
This task force deals with gathering data concerning statistics and performance of RIPE backbones. Relevant issues are methods and means of gathering relevent data of network traffic flow and network performance. Presentation techniques will be tackled also.
Task 5-1: Development, evaluation and use of statistical collecting tools for network traffic flow. The aim is to have adequate tools for all involved technologies. Examples of currently used tools are snmp, nnstat, CISCO ip-accounting, ad hoc X25-tools, ad hoc scripts for automated logging on to console ports on connected network hardware and like. These tools could certainly be enhanced in functionality, their output streamlined into formats usable for a limited set of data analysis and presentation tools.
Task 5-2: Development, evaluation and use of presentation tools for network statistics and network performance data. The aim is to investigate different ways for presentation of traffic flow and performance data. A related subject is the knowledge of which measurements are interesting and relevant with respect to performance and traffic flow. Another subject is the working out of simple and efficient methods of presenting performance and traffic flow in a complex network.
Task 5-3: Development, evaluation and use of tools for evaluating performance and estimations of possible congestion situations within the RIPE backbones and main connected links. The aim is to build a throughout knowledge of performance criteria and congestion risks for involved protocols mixes and hardwares. Related to this is the collecting of adequate benchmarking tools and by the use of these get a knowledge of available user bandwidths. The output from these efforts will act as guidelines for topology and routing decisions.
Task Force co-ordinator:
person: Bernhard Stockman
address: SUNET/NORDUnet
address: Royal Institute of Technology
address: S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
phone: +46 8 7906519
fax-no: +46 8 102510
e-mail: boss@sunet.se
Amsterdam
20 February 1991
Term: Ongoing
Task 4-4: Investigate and propose a possible legal status for RIPE.
Term: Mar90.
Amsterdam
29 November 1989