Skip to main content

IPv6 Initial Allocation

This policy proposal has been withdrawn
2005-03
State:
Withdrawn
Publication date
Affects
Draft document
IPv6 Initial Allocation
Author
  • Andy Furnell [+44 (0) 20 7645 3519 London Internet Exchange (LINX)]
Proposal Version
1.0 - 04 Apr 2005
All Versions
Withdrawn
17 Jun 2006
State Discription
Withdrawn by proposer who thought this proposal is superceded by 2006-02, IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy
Working Group
Address Policy Working Group
Proposal type
  • Modify
Policy term
Renewable

The proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria outlined in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy". The proposed change is to remove "have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other organisations within two years" and to remove the reference to "/48s" as the assignment size.  

The proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria outlined in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" The proposed change is to remove "have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other organisations within two years" and to remove the reference to "/48s" as the assignment size.

a. Arguments supporting the proposal
Many LIRs' networks do not have 200 customers to make assignments to but still maintain autonomous network and addressing policies. These require address space that is both aggregatable and independent from that of their peers. In addition, a /48 assignment is not always appropriate; ISPs might have different plans for the size of the assignments they will make and the policy should not stand as an obstacle for them. Such a change in the policy will also make IPv6 allocations more accessible and could result in the acceleration of IPv6 development.

b. Arguments opposing the proposal
With such a change in the policy, every LIR operating an autonomous network would be able to receive an IPv6 allocation. The worst case scenario would be a number of allocations equal to the number of LIRs in the RIPE region.