Archived Policy Proposals
The policy proposals on this page have been archived. You can see at a glance if they were accepted and adopted by the RIPE community or withdrawn at any stage.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- February 2007
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: Withdrawn by the proposer and the Address Policy Working Group chair as not enough consensus was reached.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- September 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- September 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: To enable country code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) and global Top Level Domain (gTLD) name server operators to provide their DNS service using shared unicast technology, RIPE NCC may assign one IPv4 and/or one IPv6 prefix to each TLD operator.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- July 2006
- Working Group:
- Database Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: The proposer decided that the proposal was no longer necessary.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- June 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: Withdrawn by proposer who thought this proposal is superceded by 2006-02, IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: Withdrawn by proposer who felt that as there had been a number of objections, consensus had not been reached.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2006
- Working Group:
- Test Traffic Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: During the discussion phase, the working group decided that the RIPE NCC should do the work and that there was no need to complete the full PDP cycle for this proposal.
- State:
- Withdrawn
- Archived Date:
- May 2006
- Working Group:
- Test Traffic Working Group
Reason for Withdrawal: During the discussion phase, the working group decided that the RIPE NCC should do the work and that there was no need to complete the full PDP cycle for this proposal.
- State:
- Accepted
- Archived Date:
- April 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
- Archived Date:
- January 2006
- Working Group:
- Address Policy Working Group
Summary: There are various terms for "end-site" in the IPv6 allocation and assignment policy (ripe-267) and the RFC3177. We need to have a final definition for "End-Site" to establish clear internal assignment policies.
Reason for Withdrawal: During discussions the proposer decided that the proposal was no longer necessary.