181 question

Hi.  Lately I've been playing quite a bit with the new 181 software
to see more how things work, etc.  (Things look really cool by the way!)
I noticed the following behavior and wondered if it was by design. 

I tried to change an object with an older 'changed' date that the one 
currently in the db.  The message that was mailed out to the people
specified in that object's 'notify' attribute said that the
object had been _replaced_.  However, the object wasn't really replaced.
That is to say, the software realized that I was submitting an object
with an older 'chagned' date and prevented me from making the update.

So it seems to me that the message sent to the people specified in the 
'notify' should read 'a change was _attempted_', yes?


Thanks,

Andy




-------- Logged at  Sat Jan 14 12:41:30 MET 1995  ---------