Towards a Disjoint IRR

> This is a good refinement.  Sprint has recently registered a zillion
> nets in the RADB.  They must want it that way.  (Hopefully, the changed
> dates are consistent with this).
> 
> Midnet also explicitly registered in the RADB, even though they are
> also in RIPE.  Those should stay.
> 
> Nets copied from the PRDB can be identified by the line:
> 
> 	changed:     nsfnet-admin at merit.edu 95xxxx
> 
> --Dale

Hum,  taking MIDnet as an example...

Sprint registered the nets in the RADB
The same nets were migrated into the RADB from the PRDB
MIDnet also registered the nets in the RADB
MIDnet was forced to register in the MCIdb
and,
before the RADB was available, they registered nets in the RIPEdb.


Which ones (if any) get pruned?
Which ones get beleived?
Who owns the data in a registry entry?

-- 
--bill



-------- Logged at  Sat Apr 29 03:23:34 MET DST 1995  ---------