Towards a Disjoint IRR

Cengiz,

> > 2) We've talked about this informally before, but I'd like a group
> >    discussion before we call it final:
> > 
> >    Once the PRDB route objects are copied/merged into the RADB,
> >    should we purge all the RADB route objects that are duplicated
> >    in other IRR databases?  Specifically, should we go through the
> >    lists of routes registered in MCI.db, CA*Net.db, and RIPE.db,
> >    and for each net registered in any of those dbs AND WHICH HAS
> >    ADVISORY AS690 LINES, remove that net from the RADB?
> 
> I think this may be OK if the object in radb.db was created from
> prdb. However, if it was created explicitly by someone in that domain,
> we should not delete it.
> 
> (To be more explicit, Ripe is the European registry, but if a domain
> in Europe also wants to register with RA, we should not say no, vice
> versa.)

This is a good refinement.  Sprint has recently registered a zillion
nets in the RADB.  They must want it that way.  (Hopefully, the changed
dates are consistent with this).

Midnet also explicitly registered in the RADB, even though they are
also in RIPE.  Those should stay.

Nets copied from the PRDB can be identified by the line:

	changed:     nsfnet-admin at merit.edu 95xxxx

--Dale



-------- Logged at  Fri Apr 28 23:30:50 MET DST 1995  ---------