Some more comments on components
Gilles Farrache
Thu May 26 10:44:04 CEST 1994
Hi Marten, Here comes a new day and some more comment on the component management. Let's assume the following configuration : ---AS2-----------AS1 ! ---AS3------------! AS1 is connected to AS2 and AS3 and cannot be used for transit trafic. At a first stage the routes entries for AS1 are : route: 193.0.8.0/24 origin: AS1 component: 193.0.8.1/32 AS2 component: 193.0.8.2/32 AS3 route: 193.0.9.0/24 origin: AS1 Then AS2 and AS3 start to agregate and that gives two entries : route: 193.0.0.0/20 origin: AS2 component: 193.0.0.0/23 HOLE component: 193.0.8.0/23 AS1 component: 193.0.12.0/22 HOLE and route: 193.0.0.0/20 origin: AS3 component: 193.0.2.0/23 HOLE component: 193.0.4.0/22 HOLE component: 193.0.8.0/23 AS1 component: 193.0.10.0/23 HOLE but on which entry are we going to put the old component stuff (the interace IP address) ? On the first ? On the second ? On both ? And from step to step we are going to end with objects completly unmanageable. In the case of a dmzhost object this will not occur. Gilles -------- Logged at Thu May 26 18:02:41 MET DST 1994 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]