prefered AS update method

I forgot, if you want to do without the autorise bit for some reason,
delete the following 3 lines from updatecheck.pl:

if (($new{"an"}||$new{"cm"}||$new{"bg"}||$new{"rp"}) && ! $new{"ua"}) {
	return $E_GUARDED;
}

Then, you do not need the authorisation bits. I know, I have to get
this out of the code and into the config ...

-Marten

Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes
 * 
 * We have a second mailbox called ripe-ddb at ripe.net for malual updates.
 * This actually is the original update mailbox from the time before
 * automatic updates.
 * People send to there, we add the authorise attribute and "dist" the
 * message to auto-dbm, auto-dbm acks to them.
 * 
 * We keep the authorise: trick confidential. Please do likewise.
 * 
 * Daniel
 * 
 *   > Andrew Adams <ala at merit.edu> writes:
 *   > 
 *   > Hi guys. I was wondering... given that once an AS is added it can't be u
 * pda
 *   > ted
 *   > my sending mail to auto-dbm (unless you have the "authorise" attribute),
 *   > what is your preferred method of having people update AS info?  Do you
 *   > indeed want people to use the "authoise" attribute or is there some othe
 * r
 *   > way - say sending mail to "ncc."
 *   > 
 *   > Thanks!
 *   > 
 *   > Andy



-------- Logged at  Tue Feb 22 10:01:05 MET 1994  ---------