Why not parsable (was: RIPE-81++...)

 Laurent Joncheray <lpj at merit.edu> writes:
  * 	Remember... we want interas-in/out to be compatible with as-in/out
  * (so we need only 1 parser). This was proposed by Jesscia *and*
lpj.

What ? it is still compatible even if we make them mandatory. 

  * We could have:
  * 
  * interas-in: [from] <aut-num> [<local-rid> <neighbor-rid>] <preference> ...
  * 
  * but it's a pain to enter both neighbor-rid and local-rid when we
  * care about only one of the values.

Why is it a pain ? One address more is not going to kill someone and
it is parsable. End story.

  * 		Laurent
  * 
  * PS: jimi, could you change your mind?
  *
Woh - I thought Jimi made hos decision and thats that. We need to get
this finished and as far as I am concerned we make this as above and
we are done.
 
		--Tony.



-------- Logged at  Tue Aug 23 16:43:49 MET DST 1994  ---------