[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations

With apologies for not doing this soon after the meeting in Lisbon,
attached is a slight revision of the IPv6 routing recommendations
document.  If I missed any suggested changes from the meeting, let me know.

I will not go through it in detail in Prague as we have limited time,
instead I would like the discussion at the meeting and here on the list
to focus on two items.

(1) Is there a need for this document?
We've heard a couple of voices on this list suggesting it is.

(2) Is /36 the correct *example* of "prudent subdivision?"
There has been one suggestion recently to increase it to /40, is that
the way to go?  Or would it be abused?

Regards,
Rob

-- 
Rob Evans
JANET(UK) Development Team Twitter: https://twitter.com/JANETDev/team
Work tweets: https://twitter.com/internetplumber

JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited
by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose
Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Science
and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: v6-aggregation.txt
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20100426/765a1893/attachment.txt>