This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John.Collins at BIT.admin.ch
John.Collins at BIT.admin.ch
Mon Apr 19 17:58:05 CEST 2010
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:05:06PM +0100, Rob Evans wrote: > Is PI a more appropriate fit for this? I don't want to rule it out, but it concerns about 30 PIs of the sizes mentioned and not all are multi homed. On the mentioned non-Internet network we would have more complexity. Will the Internet routing table be any smaller if PIs are used instead of de-aggregated PAs? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20100419/8ed070b6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]