[routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence

At 08:39 PM 29/04/2006, Philip Smith wrote:
>Hi Rob,
>
>Rob Evans said the following on 29/4/06 01:33:
> >
> > I think this is a good document.
>
>Thank you.
>
> > Other presentations this week have shown a small number of prefixes
> > contribute the majority of updates to the BGP table.  If route flap
> > damping in its current form isn't the answer to this, what is?  Is
> > education sufficient?  Do we need an "Update Police"?
>
>Well, education is one aspect, but those of us who are trying to do the
>education find that it is an uphill struggle against complacency and
>"I'm all right, mate" attitudes.
>
>As for an Update Police, I can advertise Geoff's excellent site at
>bgpupdates.potaroo.net - but I'm sure a weekly "BGP Update Report" mail
>shot like the CIDR Report could be interesting, make such update
>incidents a lot more visible, and help in the educational process.


its coming very soon

   Geoff