This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at hovland.cx
Thu Feb 26 06:20:01 CET 2004
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:23:48PM +0100, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > > There are actually some people here doing exactly that: Sending packets > > with an unroutable source-ip - with totally "legit" reasons. > > Could you be somewhat more specific about these "legit" reasons? Well.. Generally any device that would like to send messages without the need of a reply, or not in need of a reply through the same transport method/layer or ip (kind of asynchronous communication). I could name some, but I think what you are looking for is this: Routers with a non-routed ip-address by choice or by nature. IX-prefix for instance. IPv6 applies here specially. Besides from that there are software taking advantage of it like our own little project AP2P, truly anonymous P2P. Joergen Hovland ENK
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]