This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 25 23:11:53 CET 2004
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:23:48PM +0100, Jørgen Hovland wrote:
> There are actually some people here doing exactly that: Sending packets
> with an unroutable source-ip - with totally "legit" reasons.
Could you be somewhat more specific about these "legit" reasons?
[..]
> Internet was probably designed for bi-directional communication, but it
> doesn't mean you should ban one-way communication.
One-Way communication works quite well with legit (read: assigned to
the sender) source addresses.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]