This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ris-users@ripe.net/
Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Aug 15 01:54:57 CEST 2005
> I would like to create "simple" tool for IP->AS mapping based on riswhois > data. i do not believe whois data have anything about as numbers > Would you suggest some "safe to ignore" margin for number of rispeers? so, you're looking at routing data (!=whois). the problem is that some of the ris peers o send all routes they know: internal, customer, peers, upstreams o send all internal and customer o send all customer o ... so you're in for a complex and fun game on the path you're suggesting randy
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]