This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at poczta.onet.pl
Mon Aug 15 00:22:20 CEST 2005
Randy Bush wrote: >>Are there any good reasons to keep riswhois reporting default routes? > > so folk who generate and export such routes can debug. > > remember, one of the goals is operational, and debugging is > a part of that. OK. I would like to create "simple" tool for IP->AS mapping based on riswhois data. Would you suggest some "safe to ignore" margin for number of rispeers? -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
- Previous message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]