This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-list@ripe.net/
[ripe-list] DRAFT: Principles for Remuneration of the RIPE Chairs
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] DRAFT: Principles for Remuneration of the RIPE Chairs
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] DRAFT: Principles for Remuneration of the RIPE Chairs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Tue Mar 14 17:40:04 CET 2023
Ladies and gentlemen On 14/03/2023 15:14, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Kurtis,colleagues, > > this is indeedone of the scenarios where the remuneration > arrangementwouldnot work.We should not put a specific way to deal with > situations like this in the document because we cannot foresee the > details of the specific situation and we do have the governance > structures in placeto take appropriate action. See below for a more > verbose version of my thoughts on this. I agree with Daniel. It is generally counter-productive to try and cater for all possible situations in such a document. One should instead state general principles and assume a modicum of common-sense and good will from those involved. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] DRAFT: Principles for Remuneration of the RIPE Chairs
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] DRAFT: Principles for Remuneration of the RIPE Chairs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]