This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] An urgent call to action - Do your part and protect APNIC
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] An urgent call to action - Do your part and protect APNIC
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] An urgent call to action - Do your part and protect APNIC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Noah
noah at neo.co.tz
Fri Feb 24 08:34:43 CET 2023
Hi Karl, On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, 09:32 Karl Kloppenborg, <k at rl.ag> wrote: > Hello Abdkarim, > > Thanks for your question, absolutely not. > Of course if you believe the RIR has not provided or done something > correct/legal and you’ve not reached a good outcome using the RIR channels, > of course you should go to court. > > But during that time, you should be excluded from the EC nomination > process. > I cant agree more especially so as to avoid an obvious conflict of interest. Cheers, Noah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20230224/28e66e25/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] An urgent call to action - Do your part and protect APNIC
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] An urgent call to action - Do your part and protect APNIC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]