[ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion

        

        
            Hi Tome:While my English is not perfect, you really need work on your understanding of the language.And since this not the subject we discuss here, I will not future respond to you on the language skill.Lu HengChief Executive Officer  LARUS  LimitedEmail  H.Lu at LARUS.net Office +852 2988 8918   Address A3, 11/F, TML Tower, Tsuen Wan, N.T, Hong Kong SARWebsite: LARUS.netThis email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.---- On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 03:05:18 +0800  Elad Cohen<elad at netstyle.io> wrote ---------BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512  Töma,  Please refrain from listing me in any group, thank you.  This mailing list is not a debates club and not a platform for arguments of each side, serious issues were raised, please allow RIPE NCC to answer instead of creating noise and distraction.  Kind Regards, Elad ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, October 29th, 2022 at 8:28 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote:   > Peace, >  > On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 6:40 pm Lu Heng, <h.lu at larus.net> wrote: >  > > Community scrutiny does not in anyway means I speak for anyone else but by myself. >  >  > Obviously it means exactly that, if it is a "community" scrutiny, and not a "Lu Heng" scrutiny. >  > This is kind of the definition of it, innit? >  > A community scrutiny is not a "community member" scrutiny. It is a process that has been approved by rough consensus across the community. Otherwise the board and the NCC would've been overwhelmed with individual requests under the "community scrutiny" disguise. >  > Your individual concern is your individual concern. >  > Before pretending that your e-mail is a "community scrutiny", you should've had initiated a proper process in the community and evaluated the outcome, if any. >  > E.g. organizing a BoF session is an example of a *beginning* of a proper process (to the contrary, and quite notably, submitting a lightning talk candidate is not). You did not do that. >  > Another way of seeking confirmation that an issue, which is presumably important to you, is also not nothing for the community is sending an e-mail about this issue to the community mailing list and receiving support in feedback. You did send such an e-mail 5 days ago, but the support you've received since then is hardly distinguishable from none. >  > If this is a community request, then the community we're speaking of is basically you, Elad, and in any case no more than 2 more individuals. Not the RIPE community. >  > -- > Töma -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail  wnUEARYKAAYFAmNdeVkAIQkQj6WtEth1vqMWIQQHtrd3aktNVejGGPiPpa0S 2HW+o5/aAQCHvdQeOMoZL0NN2MFJJVjrIR2bZ90tyVhM72eLDuyKoAD+KM9i lEGDB5e96HpFOHqNxdKLJj3PY3laiP9TY77drgE= =uiV3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
        
        

    
    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20221030/37a511af/attachment.html>