This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elad Cohen
elad at netstyle.io
Sat Oct 29 21:05:18 CEST 2022
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Töma, Please refrain from listing me in any group, thank you. This mailing list is not a debates club and not a platform for arguments of each side, serious issues were raised, please allow RIPE NCC to answer instead of creating noise and distraction. Kind Regards, Elad ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, October 29th, 2022 at 8:28 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote: > Peace, > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 6:40 pm Lu Heng, <h.lu at larus.net> wrote: > > > Community scrutiny does not in anyway means I speak for anyone else but by myself. > > > Obviously it means exactly that, if it is a "community" scrutiny, and not a "Lu Heng" scrutiny. > > This is kind of the definition of it, innit? > > A community scrutiny is not a "community member" scrutiny. It is a process that has been approved by rough consensus across the community. Otherwise the board and the NCC would've been overwhelmed with individual requests under the "community scrutiny" disguise. > > Your individual concern is your individual concern. > > Before pretending that your e-mail is a "community scrutiny", you should've had initiated a proper process in the community and evaluated the outcome, if any. > > E.g. organizing a BoF session is an example of a *beginning* of a proper process (to the contrary, and quite notably, submitting a lightning talk candidate is not). You did not do that. > > Another way of seeking confirmation that an issue, which is presumably important to you, is also not nothing for the community is sending an e-mail about this issue to the community mailing list and receiving support in feedback. You did send such an e-mail 5 days ago, but the support you've received since then is hardly distinguishable from none. > > If this is a community request, then the community we're speaking of is basically you, Elad, and in any case no more than 2 more individuals. Not the RIPE community. > > -- > Töma -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wnUEARYKAAYFAmNdeVkAIQkQj6WtEth1vqMWIQQHtrd3aktNVejGGPiPpa0S 2HW+o5/aAQCHvdQeOMoZL0NN2MFJJVjrIR2bZ90tyVhM72eLDuyKoAD+KM9i lEGDB5e96HpFOHqNxdKLJj3PY3laiP9TY77drgE= =uiV3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: publickey - elad at netstyle.io - 0x07B6B777.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 645 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20221029/a4c4ac5a/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: publickey - elad at netstyle.io - 0x07B6B777.asc.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 119 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20221029/a4c4ac5a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] [members-discuss] A frank discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]