[ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"

I don't agree.

Just look to other RIRs, or different "groups" with a chair.

I think it must be explicit, if is in the PDP or in the "description of the chairs attributions", doesn't matter, but of course, the PDP should have an explicit reference to that document and that document should also reach consensus in the community.

 

El 7/2/21 23:28, "ripe-list en nombre de Nick Hilliard" <ripe-list-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de nick at foobar.org> escribió:

    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote on 07/02/2021 22:04:
    > El 7/2/21 22:49, "Nick Hilliard" <nick at foobar.org> escribió:
    >      Incidentally, the duty to manage discussion isn't something specific to
    >      RIPE WG chairs - it's a general accepted principle about the rights and
    >      responsibilities of all chairs, regardless of what they're chairing.
    >      There's nothing unusual about the RIPE WG chair duties in this respect.
    > 
    > [Jordi] Again, where is that in the PDP? We can't accept a PDP that we can interpret in different ways when we (or the chairs) wish.

    Jordi,

    apologies, I tried to make it clear that this was not something specific 
    to RIPE WG chairs, but maybe I wasn't clear enough:  it's not in the PDP 
    because it's a generally accepted duty and responsibility of all chairs, 
    everywhere.  If there were a need to document it explicitly - and I 
    don't think there is a need - it would be in the WG Chair Job 
    Description and Procedures document.

    Nick




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.