[ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote on 07/02/2021 22:04:
> El 7/2/21 22:49, "Nick Hilliard" <nick at foobar.org> escribió:
>      Incidentally, the duty to manage discussion isn't something specific to
>      RIPE WG chairs - it's a general accepted principle about the rights and
>      responsibilities of all chairs, regardless of what they're chairing.
>      There's nothing unusual about the RIPE WG chair duties in this respect.
> 
> [Jordi] Again, where is that in the PDP? We can't accept a PDP that we can interpret in different ways when we (or the chairs) wish.

Jordi,

apologies, I tried to make it clear that this was not something specific 
to RIPE WG chairs, but maybe I wasn't clear enough:  it's not in the PDP 
because it's a generally accepted duty and responsibility of all chairs, 
everywhere.  If there were a need to document it explicitly - and I 
don't think there is a need - it would be in the WG Chair Job 
Description and Procedures document.

Nick