[ripe-db-requirements-tf] Follow-up items from face-to-face meeting at RIPE 79

> On 16 Oct 2019, at 15:49, james at kennedyipam.com james at kennedyipam.com <james at kennedyipam.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Shane, 
> 
> The updated charter in your previous email looks good, thanks! 
> 
> Personally I believe we already have enough people with the required knowledge and representation base on the TF in the originally assigned 6. Nothing against Théophile at all, more that I don't really see the need for additional people at this early stage. 

We may want to consider having an odd number on the task force - https://www.fastcompany.com/1193130/could-your-team-be-more-effective-odd-man-out <https://www.fastcompany.com/1193130/could-your-team-be-more-effective-odd-man-out>

> 
>> He looks forward to lots of detailed discussion 
>> about the requirements document, and especially his own involvement in that.
> 
> Community feedback is always welcome of course but tomorrow's update at the DB WG is only to communicate who the TF is, our purpose and charter etc. rather than hold a detailed discussion about the requirements? 

Detailed discussions for the future, tomorrow an intro and Thursday a little more detail with slides, I believe is what we agreed.

Cheers,
Bijal

> 
> Regards, 
> James 
> 
>> On October 16, 2019 at 11:48 AM Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Friends,
>> 
>> I talked to Hans Petter Holen last night, and neither of us were sure 
>> who is allowed to update the charter or approve (or not) proposed 
>> changes. 😉 Given that, I think we're okay to update the items to 
>> deliver and the associated dates, as per my previous mail with a 
>> proposed updated charter.
>> 
>> Hans Petter was not super enthusiastic about adding people to the task 
>> force. I am sure that he can be convinced, but clearly I fucked up by 
>> inviting Théophile along to our meeting. I'm basically happy for 
>> Théophile to join or not, whatever we think makes the most sense.
>> 
>> I talked to Denis Walker this morning, and let him know that at least I 
>> will be at the Database Working Group session tomorrow to explain what 
>> this task force is. He looks forward to lots of detailed discussion 
>> about the requirements document, and especially his own involvement in that.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> --
>> Shane
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-db-requirements-tf/attachments/20191016/5e148abf/attachment.html>