This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu May 14 21:03:00 CEST 2020
> On 14 May 2020, at 19:52, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote: > > I think it would be much in the spirit of how HPH was selected & > confirmed (and compatible with the 'Pragmatism' section of RIPE-728) to > just trust HPH to indeed pick an RIPE interim-interim-interim-Chair for > now. In that case, why not have that as the appointment process all the time? ;-) It would certainly put an end to this after-the-fact shed-painting about Nomcom composition, NCC “control”, how diverse or not the pool of candidates is, process minutae, etc, etc. And having lit the blue touchpaper, I will run off to a safe distance to watch the ensuing fireworks. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]