[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process

On Thu, 14 May 2020, Lars-Johan Liman wrote:

(...)
>
> I wish we hade a wide selection of excellent candidates. We don't. What
> we have is a limited set of candidates, all of which, IMHO, are likely
> to do a very good job if chosen. Responsibility of being RIPE chair is
> something that only a limited set of peole can (for personal reasons)
> and will want to carry.

Exactly. Now it crossed my mind it would be good if someone had the idea 
of nominating you. But unfortunately we're beyond that point.


> I wish we had the same amount of engagement in _participating_ (as in
> being an active member of a group or committee) in the process as we do
> in criticising the output. We don't. I didn't quite see 200 ppl turn up
> for a seat on the NomCom.

There was the "criteria", which (at least) i failed to complain about in 
due time :-)


(...)
> I will give my feedback to the Nomcom and support my favourite
> candidate, and I will give the NomCom the cred the deserve.

I will do the same, and i must say i would have liked to see at least 
three of the NomCom members on the candidate list (which seems to be 
clearly incompatible...)


Regards,
Carlos